Answers to MODLAND Validation FAQ
Jeffrey T. Morisette, Jeffrey L. Privette, Chris Justice
Why are there not more Core Sites?
Because the EOS Core Site Network is a pioneering effort, its development
has required a significant amount of coordination and activity among EOS
instrument teams, DAACs, validation scientists, science networks and field
site personnel. Thus, we sought to keep the network of manageable
size (initially 24 sites worldwide) until we have a proven operational
system. We are also tightly constrained by financial, personnel and
equipment resources. Nevertheless, the Core Sites are firmly established,
and ground-measurement activities and data protocols are in place.
Combined with the non-core sites, the Network should provide sufficient
validation data for the initial year of Terra land validation.
Why are there so few core sites outside the US/North America?
U.S. sites are generally the most familiar to and cost effective for most
EOS/NASA investigators. In addition, since existing site networks
most closely associated with NASA and pre-launch activities are in the
U.S. (e.g., the U.S. LTER network and the BOREAS and FIFE sites), their
use allows significant resource leveraging. However, other major
biomes around the world are represented. While the international
sites are more sparse, these locations will provide procedural and protocol
development for regional EOS activities. Within a year of launch,
additional international sites and site networks can be incorporated into
EOS validation activities.
How big is a 'site'?
The nominal EOS Validation Core site extends +/-100 km from its center
coordinates (corresponding to a science tower or other key feature).
For logistical purposes, any measurement or activity within this area will
be associated with the site. Thus, there may be multiple measurement
locations and land cover types at "one" Core Site.
What is expected from a Core Site?
A Core Site is expected to maintain some data collect infrastructure (such
as an instrument tower), accessibility for validation field campaigns,
and reasonably stable land use. We encourage field data collectors
to register all ground data with the Oak Ridge National Lab Mercury
system
Must a core site have a tower?
No. An instrument tower is not required and some of the Core Sites
do not have towers. However, many sites do have towers either in place
or planned. Towers can greatly facilitate the ongoing measurements
of some parameters, such as landscape-level reflectance and CO2 or energy
fluxes, which are EOS Terra products.
Must bigfoot sampling be used?
The BigFoot
program has developed a sampling procedure meant to characterize the
landscape surrounding a flux tower. While it is not essential for
all validation campaigns to follow BigFoot's sampling scheme, certain elements
of their procedure are important.
-
The sampling should cover a large enough area to relate to a small block
of MODIS pixels. At 1-km pixels, this implies that sampling should
cover an area from 5 to 10 km on a side.
-
Due to anisotropy in the landscape (some examples are given in the Jeff
Morisette.
Are instruments available if I supply field personnel?
MODLAND has some field instrumentation (such as LAI-2000s, albedometers,
hand-held digital NDVI cameras and ceptometers). They are generally
available on loan, however the borrower must be willing to share the resulting
data with MODLAND investigators. An agreement on data use and rights
may be recommended in such cases. For more information contact for Jeff
Morisette.
Will MODLAND buy equipment?
MODLAND generally will not purchase validation equipment for non-MODIS
investigators or sites, however its equipment can be borrowed (see above).
If I agree to share my field data with EOS investigators, how quickly is
it needed?
If the field activity is funded by the EOS Validation Program, the data
must be made available to the science community within six months of data
collection. For field activities not sponsored by that Program, it
is of course the data collectors' choice. However, because the entire
science community and general public benefit from a rapid and accurate
validation of EOS satellites and products, we urge field personnel to contact
EOS instrument teams and consider rapid data sharing.
If I agree to share my field data, must I register it with the Mercury
data system? Can access to my data in Mercury be limited?
Using the Mercury system to
register field data is strongly encouraged. The Mercury system has
been developed to include an easy-to-use metadata
creation tool. This tool can be helpful to any investigator wishing
to create metadata for their fieldwork - even if just for their own records.
The Mercury system also allows the user to maintain the data locally and
to, during initial QA or revisions, "hide" the data from the Mercury
search and query harvester. This allows the investigator ultimate
control of any data they register with Mercury.
If I wish to join in EOS validation, must I work at a Core Site?
Most quality field data can be used to validate a related EOS product.
However, when investigators are flexible about locations, we urge them
to consider working at a Core Site (or with data from a Core Site) since
those sites will be the most EOS data rich in the early post-launch time
frame. This will provide the most opportunity for multiple data comparisons,
scaling, and leveraged investigations.
Can my site be added as a Core Site?
Additional sites will be considered for inclusion as Core Sites soon after
launch. Investigators wishing to nominate a site should contact Jeff
Morisette or a MODLAND
PI. A major goal of the Core Sites is to gather enough data and
focus initial validation activity so to establish validation protocols
and procedures; which, in turn can then be implemented to a far greater
number of sites, which themselves may not be "Core Sites". The primary
considerations of adding a site to the "Core Site" list are that the site:
-
fills a need with respect to biome type,
-
is integrated with some other network (such as Fluxnet, AERONET,...),
-
has a long-term history and committment,
-
has a site contact committed to maintaining communication with MODLAND/NASA,
and
-
has field data collections that can be make available within a resonable
time (~6 months)
If I agree to share data with EOS validation, how often must I collect
data?
Optimal data collection frequency depends on the parameter being characterized
and the method and objective of the validation effort. Researchers
are urged to contact the EOS PI(s) in charge of relevant product(s) for
guidance.
If I wish to contribute to the EOS validation effort, much I conduct the
comparisons of my data with the corresponding EOS products?
This responsibility ultimately falls on the EOS instrument teams and validation
investigators. They are most familiar with the EOS algorithms and
products. However, those individuals cannot conduct all of
the studies required for comprehensive global validation of all EOS products.
Moreover, independent field investigators may be most knowledgable about
the sites, conditions, and the field data sets. Therefore, in most
cases, collaborative efforts between independent data collectors and EOS
investigators may be most beneficial to the programs' objectives.
What are opportunities to participate in SAFARI 2000?
SAFARI 2000 (Southern African Regional Science Initiative 2000) is an umbrella-like
coordinating activity for land-atmosphere research in southern Africa.
It is open to any investigator wishing to join. Participation in
SAFARI increases opportunities for resource leveraging (e.g., NASA ER-2
flights), data and information exchange, and community activities (e.g.,
simultaneous sampling of very large areas). It can also facilitate
access to or support from the region. Because its Intensive Field
Campaigns are occurring very soon after Terra's launch, SAFARI provides
an excellent foundation on which to validate and use EOS products.
Interested investigators should consult the SAFARI
WWW page.
Who will maintain www sites for the Core Sites?
MODLAND maintains a WWW page for each Core Site. The Core Site pages
provide an overview of the site (including site coordinates and vegetation
characteristics), descriptions of and access to available data, and links
to related WWW locations. Investigators working at a given site are
encouraged to maintain a more detailed WWW site and coordinate with MODLAND
so the web sites are complementary rather than redundant. |
|
|